International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences

International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences

The Comparison of the Effect of Photodynamic Therapy Using two Photosensitizer Indocyanine Green and Methylene Blue on the Colony Count of Staphylococcus Aureus (In Vitro)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Zahra Sanaei 1
Arash Azizi 2
Arash Rahimi 3
1 Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran
10.30485/ijsrdms.2019.89757
Abstract
Background and aim: Contamination of microorganisms, including Staphylococcus Aureus, in oral saliva and oral tissues, is a common problem. Therefore, in this study, photodynamic therapy's effect on the number of oral Staphylococcus Aureus colonies. Was evaluated using two indices of Indocyanine Green and Methylene Blue with sensitizer with Chlorhexidine mouthwash.
Materials and methods: In the first stage, a new culture of ATCC St.Aureus 25923 was performed. Colonies of Staphylococcus Aureus were counted. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups: the first group was Methylene Blue, and the second group was subjected to 2% Indocyanine Green. All samples from both groups were sampled before laser irradiation and colonized in the culture medium for 24 hours. The third group of teeth was immersed in 2% Chlorhexidine mouthwash and sampled. The fourth group was considered as the control group. Also, Post hoc analysis was used for comparing before and after treatment in each group.
Results: This study showed that all three experimental groups reduced the number of Staphylococcus Aureus colonies. However, Indocyanine Green and Methylene Blue did not significantly decrease the number of colonies before and after treatment (p> 0.05), but Chlorhexidine caused a significant decrease in the number of Staphylococcus colony Aureus (p <0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that all three groups of Chlorhexidine, Indocyanine Green and Methylene Blue, reduced the colony count of Staphylococcus Aureus, although the effects of the reduction of Staphylococcus Aureus were significantly more severe than Chlorhexidine.
Keywords
Chlorhexidine
Indocyanine Green
Methylene Blue
Photodynamic Therapy
Staphylococcus Aureus

Subjects

  1. Wilson M. Bacterial biofilms and human disease. Science progress2001; 84(3):235-54.
  2. Wilson P, Wilson PM. Dental plaque revisited: oral biofilms in health and disease. Journal of Periodontal Research1998; 33(7):438-439.
  3. Jenkinson HF. Adherence andaccumulation of oral streptococci. Trends in microbiology 1994; 2(6):209-12.
  4. Pires JR, Rossa Junior C, Pizzolitto AC. In vitro antimicrobial efficiency of a mouthwash containing triclosan/gantrez and sodium bicarbonate. Brazilian oral research 2007; 21(4):342.
  5. Derks A, Frencken J, Bronkhorst E, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Katsaros C. Effect of chlorhexidine varnish application on mutans streptococci counts in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2008; 133(3):435-9.
  6. Pitten F-A, Kramer A. Antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic mouthrinse solutions. European journal of clinical pharmacology 1999; 55 (2):95- 100.
  7. Soukos NS, Goodson JM. Photodynamic therapy in the control of oral biofilms. J Periodontology2011; 55(1):143-66.
  8. Dougherty TJ. An update on photodynamic therapy applications. Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery 2002; 20(1):3-7.
  9. Wainwright M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.1998; 42(1):13-28.
  10. Pfitzer A,Sigusch BW, Alberecht V,GI ockmann E. Killing of periodonto pathogenic bacteria by photodynamic therapy. Jperiodontal 2004; 75:1343-1349.
  11. Wilson M. Lethal photosensitization of oral bacteria and its potential application in the photodynamic therapy of oral infections. Photochemical and photobiological sciences2004; 3:412-418. 12. Dougherty TJ,Gomer CJ,Hen derson BW,Jori G, kessel D, Korbelik M,Moan J,Peny Q.photodynamic therapy.J Nat cancer Inst.1998;90:889- 905.
  12. Ochsner M. Photo physical and photobiological process in the photodynamic therapy of tumors. J photochemphotobiol B 1997; 39:1-8.
  13. Moan J, Berg K. The photo degration of porphyrins in cells that can be used to estimate the life time of singlet oxygen.photochemphotobial 1991; 53:549-53.
  14. Peng Q, Moan J, Nesland J. Correlation of subcellular and intratumoral photosensitizer localization with ultra structural features after photodynamic therapy. Ultrastructpatol 1996; 20:109-29.
  15. Raghavendra M, Koregol A, Bhol S. Phtodynamictherapy: a target therapy in periodontics. Australian Dental Journal 2009;54(1):102-190.
  16. Allison P, Baganto V, Cuenca R, Downie G, Sibata C. The future of photodynamic therapy in oncolony.FutureOncol 2006; 2:53-71.
  17. Buytaert E, Dewaele M, Agostinis P. Molecular effectors of multiple cell death pathways initiated by photodynamic therapy. BiochimBiophysActa 2007; 1976:86-107.
  18. Wein Wright M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy.J An imicrobial chemother. 1998; 42:13-28.
  19. Sharman WM, Allen CM,Van Leir JE. Photo dynamic Therapeutic :basic and clinical applica ons.Drug Discov 1999;4:507-514.
  20. Uzdensky AB,Dergacheva OY, Zahavorokova AA,Reshetnikov Av, Ponomarev GV. photodynamic e ect of novel chlorin e6 deriva ves on a single nerv cell.Life sci 2004;73:2185-2197.
  21. Gottumukkala S, Mantena S. Photodynamic in antimicrobial periodontal therapy. Indian J Oral Sci 2012; 3:8-12.
  22. Baumler W, Abels C, Karrer S, Weiss T, Mess Mann H, Landthaler M. Photo- oxidative killing of human colonic cancer cells using indocyanine Green and infrared light. Br J Cancer 1999; 80:360-363.
  23. Hope CK, Wilson M. Indication of lethal photosensitization in biofilms using a confocal scanning laser as the excitation source.JAntimicrob 2006; 57(6):1227-1230.
  24. Sreenivasan p, Gihins E.Effects of low dose chlrohexidine mouthrinses on oral bacteria and salivary microflora including those producing hydrogen sul de.Jod 2004;19:309-313.
  25. Aparecida Pereira C, Borges Pereira Costa A, Moura Carreira C. CamposJunqueriraJ,Olavo Cardoso JorgaA.photodynamic inactivation of streptococcus mutans and streptococcus sanguinis bio ims:invitro. Laser Med Sci 2013 ;28:859-864.
  26. Vahabi S, FekrazadR, AyremlouS,TaheriS, ZangenehN. the effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therepy with radachlorin and Touidine Blue on streptococcus mutans.J Dent (Tehran) 2011;8(2):48-54. 28. Vaziri S, Kangarlou A,Shahbazi R,Nazari M.comparesion of the bacterial efficiency of photodynamic therepy 5.5 % sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidineagaint enterococcus faecalis in root canals: an in vitro study. DentRes J 2012;9(5):613-618.
  27. Michael R.effectiveness of antimicromial photodynamic therepy on Staphylococcus Aureus using phenothiazinium dye with red lasar.J SPIE 2015; 10:9309.
  28. Chein-Ming H,Yen-Ha0 H.Aminolevulinic acid induced photodynamic inactivation on Staphylococcus Aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa.J of food and drug Analysis 2014;22(3):350-355.
  29. Renata T,YasinKH,FabioR,MauroS,peterJ.antimicrobial susceptibility of photodynamic therepy (UVA/riboflavin) againt Staphylococcus Aureus .JSciElo 2012;6:75.
International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences
Volume 1, Issue 2
Spring 2019
Pages 13-17

  • Receive Date 28 May 2019
  • Revise Date 17 June 2019
  • Accept Date 21 June 2019
  • Publish Date 01 June 2019