International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences

International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences

Airway Assessment in Patients Undergoing Surgery and General Anaesthesia and its Application in Prediction of Difficult Airway

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, India
2 Consultant Anaesthetist, Panipat, India
Abstract
Background and aim: Anaesthesiologists face challenges in airway management, but pre-anesthetic airway assessment helps identify potential complications and prepare alternative plans for children with challenging airways. The primary goal of airway assessment during pre-anesthetic evaluation is to identify difficult airways and prepare alternative treatments for mask ventilation, direct laryngoscopy, and endotracheal intubation.
Material and methods: Patients aged 8-14 years, of either sex, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II, were included. Four parameters, namely the modified Mallampati test, neck circumference, measurement of thyromental distance, and the Ratio of height to thyromental distance, were assessed pre-operatively using the same flexible measuring tape to avoid instrumental bias. These parameters were then correlated with Cormack and Lehane's grading system for assessing a difficult airway.
Results: All four parameters, namely modified Mallampati test, thyromental distance, Ratio of height to thyromental distance, and neck circumference, were found to be statistically significant in predicting difficult airway in children of the age group 8-14 years. Out of the four parameters assessed, the Ratio of Height to Thyromental Distance (RHTMD) had the highest sensitivity of 98.41%, followed by Mallampati grading (MPG) with a sensitivity of 96.83%, suggesting that they are highly sensitive predictors of difficult airways in children.
Conclusions: To predict airway status in children, the modified Mallampati test is the most useful parameter, which can be used as a bedside screening test in the 8-14 year age group, as it has high sensitivity and the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, Drolet P, Duggan LV, Griesdale DE, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management–part 1–difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;60(11):1089-1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3.
[2] Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(2):251-70.
[3] Huang AS, Hajduk J, Rim C, Coffield S, Jagannathan N. Focused review on management of the difficult paediatric airway. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2019;63(6):428-36. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_250_19.
[4] Krishna SG, Bryant JF, Tobias JD. Management of the difficult airway in the pediatric patient. Journal of pediatric intensive care. 2018;7(03):115-25. https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0038-1624576.
[5] Karsli C. Managing the challenging pediatric airway: Continuing Professional Development. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2015;62(9):1000-16. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12630-015-0423.
[6] Ahmad I, Onwochei DN, Muldoon S, Keane O, El‐Boghdadly K. Airway management research: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(2):225-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14471.
[7] Engelhardt T, Machotta A, Weiss M. Management strategies for the difficult paediatric airway. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 2013;3(4):183-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2013.05.007.
[8] Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation; a prospective study. Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal. 1985;32:429-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011357.
[9] Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39(11):1105-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08932.x.
[10] Patil VU. Predicting the difficulty of intubation utilizing an intubation gauge. Anesth Rev. 1983;10:32-3.
[11] Sumer DS, Cham DS, Raipure DA, Dhumane DP. Evaluation of difficult airway in paediatric population ranging from 5–12 years age group. Int J Med Res Rev. 2019;7(5):411-21.
[12] Inal MT, Memiş D, Sahin SH, Gunday I. Comparison of different tests to determine difficult intubation in pediatric patients. Revista brasileira de anestesiologia. 2014;64:391-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.02.001.
[13] Kılıç Y, Onay M, Ceyhan D, Bilir A, Yelken B. Comparison of different predictive tests for difficult airways in pediatrics. ENT Updates. 2020;10(3):402-8. https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.830458.
[14] Aggarwal A, Sharma KR, Verma UC. Evaluation of difficult Airway predictors in pediatric population as a clinical investigation. J Anesth Clin Res. 2012;3(11):1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000256.
Volume 7, Issue 2
Spring 2025
Pages 63-69

  • Receive Date 15 April 2025
  • Revise Date 22 May 2025
  • Accept Date 05 June 2025
  • Publish Date 09 June 2025