[1] Layton DM, Morgano SM, Muller F, Kelly JA, Nguyen CT, Scherrer SS, et al. The glossary of prosthodontic terms 2023. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(4S1):e1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.03.003.
[2] Galagali G, Kalekhan SM, Nidawani P, Naik J, Behera S. Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2016;16(2):148-53. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.179322.
[3] Prasad KD, Shah N, Hegde C. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2012;3(4):383-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107419.
[4] Sharma A, Sharma LA, Azhagarasan NS, Shankar C. Comparative study of the effect of three different interocclusal recording materials on reproducibility of horizontal condylar registrations in two different semiadjustable articulators: A clinical study. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2011;1(3):155-62. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1029.
[5] Bhandari A, Manandhar A, Singh RK, Suwal P, Parajuli PK. A Comparative study to measure the horizontal condylar guidance obtained by protrusive interocclusal records and panoramic radiographic images in completely edentulous patients. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal. 2018;14(1):21-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v14i1.18947.
[6] Khalikar D, Mahale D, Khal D. Comparison of condylar guidance angulations obtained from protrusive records and orthopantomogram in edentulous subjects–An in vivo study. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education. 2017;5:6241-5.
[7] Tannamala PK, Pulagam M, Pottem SR, Swapna B. Condylar guidance: Correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: A pilot study. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2012;21(3):181-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00811.x.
[8] Kumar CD, Selvaraj S, Mohan J, Raju R. Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients. Annals of African Medicine. 2023;22(3):316-20. https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_70_22.
[9] Kattadiyil MT, Alzaid AA, Campbell SD. What materials and reproducible techniques may be used in recording centric relation? Best evidence consensus statement. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021;30(S1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13321.
[10] Gilboa I, Cardash HS, Kaffe I, Gross MD. Condylar guidance: Correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2008;99(6):477-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60112-2.
[11] Kaur S, Datta K. An in vitro study to evaluate the accuracy of orthopantomograph as an aid to determine condylar guidance. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2018;18(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_243_17.
[12] Shetty S, Satish Babu CL, Tambake D, Surendra Kumar GP, Setpal AT. A comparative evaluation of condylar guidance value from radiograph with interocclusal records made during jaw relation and try-in: A pilot study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2013;13:321-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0284-4.
[13] Shah RJ, Agarwal P, Negi P. A Comparative Analysis Of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined By Two Articulator Systems And Orthopantomographs (OPG) In Completely Edentulous Patients. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2013;5(4):72.
[14] Patil R, Dubey S, Patil A, Shetty P. Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance obtained by gothic arch tracing an interocclusal record and by panoramic radiographic tracing in edentulous subjects: A clinicoradiographic analysis. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(1):57-9.
[15] Shetty S, Kunta M, Shenoy K. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2018;18(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_207_17.
[16] Sirana P, Kumar N, Malhotra A, Singhal N, Chaudhary N. Comparative Analysis of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Recorded by Intraoral Gothic Arch Tracing and Panoramic Radiograph in Completely Edentulous Patients. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2018;19(11):1301-5.
[17] Verma S, Kalra T, Kumar M, Bansal A. Comparative Analysis of Condylar Guidance Angle Obtained by Protrusive Interocclusal Records and Radiographic Methods in Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study. Dental Journal of Advance Studies. 2022;10(2). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1753487.
[18] Unal Erzurumlu Z, Celenk P. A radiological evaluation of the effects of edentulousness on the temporomandibular joint. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2020;47(3):319-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12910.
[19] Acharya S, Pandey A, Sethi S, Meena MK. A comparative study of condylar guidance setting obtained from interocclusal records and panoramic radiographs in both dentulous and edentulous subjects. Dental Journal of Advance Studies. 2015;3(02):85-90.
[20] Godavarthi AS, Sajjan MS, Raju AR, Rajeshkumar P, Premalatha A, Chava N. Correlation of condylar guidance determined by panoramic radiographs to one determined by conventional methods. Journal of international oral health: JIOH. 2015;7(8):123-8.
[21] Paul R, Das S, Bhattacharyya J, Ghosh S, Goel P, Dutta K. A study on the accuracy of horizontal condylar guidance values in edentulous patients using preprosthetic diagnostic radiographs. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2018;18(3):263-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_38_18.
[22] Konark AS, Jayam C, Singh R, Huda I, Nabi AT. Assessment of sagittal condylar guidance with protrusive inter-occlusal method, panoramic radiographs, and lateral cephalogram: A comparative study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2021;22(1):48.
[23] Gheedle R, John P. Comparative Evaluation of the Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Protrusive Interocclusal Records, OPG, and CBCT in Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2023;24(6):403-8.
[24] Lassmann Ł, Nowak Z, Żółtowska A. Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2024;132(1):81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.017.
[25] Potdukhe SS, Iyer JM, Nadgere JB. Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2023;23(4):322-34. https://oi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_216_23.
[26] Shah K, Patel JR, Chhabra T, Patel P. Correlation of the condylar guidance obtained by protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographs in completely edentulous patients: An in vivo study. Advances in Human Biology. 2014;4(2):50-6.
[27] Amin B, Kumar GS, Raj B, Shetty S, Shetty A, Mithra A. Assessment and Comparison of the Condylar Guidance by Protrusive Inter-Occlusal Records and Panoramic Radiographic Imaging in Edentulous and Dentulous Individuals. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2018; 8 (1):10-16. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1195.
[28] Keerthana SR, Mohammed HS, Hariprasad A, Anand M, Ayesha S. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An: in vivo: study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2021;21(4):397-404.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_239_21.
