International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences

International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences

Effect of Wax Pattern Fabrication Technique and Convergence Angle of the Preparation on the Accuracy of Full Veneer Metal Crowns: An in Vitro Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Prosthodontics, Govt Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Kerala, India
Abstract
Background and aim: To compare the marginal and internal adaptation of full veneer crowns cast from wax patterns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and conventional wax-up technique employing two different convergence angles.
Material and methods: Two metal master dies, each with a convergence angle of 6 and 12-degrees, were duplicated 24 times to obtain 48 stone dies. Twelve dies from each group were randomly chosen for conventional wax-up (Group A) and the other twelve for the three-dimensional printed wax pattern (Group B) fabrication. Cobalt-chromium full veneer crowns were cemented onto the dies using glass ionomer cement. The cemented crowns and dies were sectioned in the midline buccolingually to measure the marginal and internal gaps using a stereomicroscope and digital image analysis software (Image J). Data obtained were recorded in microns, and an independent 't' test was used to compare quantitative parameters between categories.
Results: Group B showed a statistically significant reduction in marginal discrepancy in crowns with a 6-degree taper (114.4 ± 37.5) compared to Group A (160.4 ±58.1). Group B did not demonstrate any significant difference when the 6-degree and 12-degree tapers were compared, but Group A showed a significant improvement in marginal and internal adaptation with the 12-degree taper.
Conclusions: For the 6-degree taper, three-dimensional printing resulted in better marginal and internal fit than conventional wax patterns. Conventional and three-dimensional Printing offered similar accuracy within the acceptable range for a 12-degree taper.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Jw M. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br dent j. 1971;131:107-11.
[2] Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1986;56(4):416-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90379-3.
[3] Vojdani MA, Torabi KA, Farjood EB, Khaledi AA. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. Journal of Dentistry. 2013;14(3):118-29.
[4] Fransson B, Øilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dental Materials. 1985;1(5):197-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80019-1.
[5] Silva NR, De Souza GM, Coelho PG, Stappert CF, Clark EA, Rekow ED, et al. Effect of water storage time and composite cement thickness on fatigue of a glass‐ceramic trilayer system. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2008;84(1):117-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30851.
[6] Øysæd H, Ruyter IE. Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. Journal of biomedical materials research. 1986;20(2):261-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200214.
[7] Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2010;37(11):866-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02113.x.
[8] Homsy FR, Özcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZA. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;120(4):530-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.006.
[9] Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2012;21(8):641-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00888.x.
[10] Witkowski S. (CAD-)/CAM in dental technology. Quintessence of Dental Technology (QDT). 2005;28:169.
[11] Jockusch J, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing of dental polymers: An overview on processes, materials and applications. Dental materials journal. 2020;39(3):345-54. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-123.
[12] Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. European journal of oral sciences. 2008;116(3):272-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x.
[13] Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushima S, von Steyern PV. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In‐Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN‐I system. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2005;32(10):753-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01506.x.
[14] Khaledi AA, Farzin M, Akhlaghian M, Pardis S, Mir N. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020;124(1):81-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.002.
[15] de Almeida JG, Guedes CG, Abi‐Rached FD, Trindade FZ, Fonseca RG. Marginal Fit of Metal‐Ceramic Copings: Effect of Luting Cements and Tooth Preparation Design. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(1):e265-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12685.
[16] Arora A, Yadav A, Upadhyaya V, Jain P, Verma M. Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of copings fabricated from three different fabrication techniques: An: in vitro: study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2018;18(2):102-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_327_17.
[17] Bhaskaran E, Azhagarasan NS, Miglani S, Ilango T, Krishna GP, Gajapathi B. Comparative evaluation of marginal and internal gap of Co–Cr copings fabricated from conventional wax pattern, 3D printed resin pattern and DMLS tech: an in vitro study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2013:189-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0283-5.
[18] Fathi HM, Al-Masoody AH, El-Ghezawi N, Johnson A. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2016 Mar;24(1):10-7. PMID: 27039473.
[19] Moldovan O, Rudolph H, Quaas S, Bornemann G, Luthardt RG. Internal and external fit of CAM-made zirconia bridge frameworks-a pilotstudy. Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift. 2006;61(1):38-42.
[20] Chan DC, Wilson Jr AH, Barbe P, Cronin Jr RJ, Chung C, Chung K. Effect of preparation convergence on retention and seating discrepancy of complete veneer crowns. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2004;31(10):1007-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01376.x.
[21] Kharat SS, Tatikonda A, Raina S, Gubrellay P, Gupta N, Asopa SJ. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of seating cast metal fixed partial denture on the abutment teeth with varying degree of convergence angle. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2015;9(7):ZC56-60. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13155.6206.
[22] Ranjan Tushar, Shetty G, Gangaiah M, Revanna R. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy In CAD\CAM Milled, Laser Sintered And Cast Metal Copings With Varying Degree of Convergence Angle of Abutments: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Prosthodontics Dentistry. 2020;15 (2): 8-23.
[23] Alnedewy A, Alnajar B. Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Metal Core Fabricated by 3D Printing technique, milled wax/lost wax technique and Conventional lost wax technique. Evaluation. 2023;46(03):7859-66.
[24] Giti R, Farrahi P. Marginal fit of 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: Influence of pattern fabrication method and repeated porcelain firings. Plos one. 2024;19(4):e0301799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301799.
[25] Aldahian N, Khan R, Mustafa M, Vohra F, Alrahlah A. Influence of conventional, CAD-CAM, and 3D printing fabrication techniques on the marginal integrity and surface roughness and wear of interim crowns. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(19):8964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198964.
Volume 6, Issue 2
Spring 2024
Pages 49-54

  • Receive Date 08 April 2024
  • Revise Date 17 May 2024
  • Accept Date 22 May 2024
  • Publish Date 01 June 2024