Evaluation of the Flexural Strength Values of Acrylic Resin Denture Bases Reinforced with Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Document Type : Review Article


1 Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

4 Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

5 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

6 Faculty of Dentistry, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran


Background and aim: In the present study, differences in the effects of adding SiNPs at different concentrations (1wt%, 3wt%, 5wt%, and 7wt%) on the flexural strength of the heat-polymerized PMMA were investigated.
Material and methods: Based on the PRISMA 2020 Checklist, the current study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases from Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, ISI, Web of Knowledge, and Embase were searched until 12 December 2022 to find systematic literature. The 95% confidence interval for mean differences was calculated using the fixed effect model and inverse-variance method. Stata/MP. v.17 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.
Results: Duplicate studies were removed from the initial review, which also reviewed 97 studies' abstracts. Two authors thoroughly reviewed 39 studies, and six studies were finally selected. Mean differences of flexural strength between the addition of 1%, 3%, 5%, and 7% SiNPs reinforcement and control group was 12.99 (MD, 12.99 95% CI 9.92, 16.05; p>0.05), 5.94 (MD, 5.94 95% CI 4.98, 6.91; p>0.05), 8.28 (MD, 8.28 95% CI 7.14, 9.43; p>0.05) and -2.97 (MD, -2.97 95% CI -3.87, -2.07; p>0.05), respectively.
Conclusions: Based on the present meta-analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between the effects of adding SiO2 nanoparticles at different concentrations (1wt%, 3wt%, 5wt%, and 7wt%) on flexural strength of the heat-polymerized acrylic compared to the control group. No specific concentration of SiO2 nanoparticles is suitable for strengthening acrylic resin.


Main Subjects

[1] Krishnan CR, Swamy KR, Meenakshi S, Aradya A, Ramu R. Evaluation of shear bond strength of high molecular chitosan nanoparticle incorporated heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin with acrylic resin teeth: An in-vitro study. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023;75:77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.035.
[2] Gad MM, Fouda SM, ArRejaie AS, Al‐Thobity AM. Comparative effect of different polymerization techniques on the flexural and surface properties of acrylic denture bases. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(4):458-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12605.
[3] Gad MM, Rahoma A, Abualsaud R, Al-Thobity AM, Akhtar S, Siddiqui IA, et al. Influence of artificial aging and ZrO2 nanoparticle-reinforced repair resin on the denture repair strength. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2020;12(4):e354-62. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56610.
[4] Gad MM, Rahoma A, Abualsaud R, Al‐Thobity AM, Fouda SM. Effect of repair gap width on the strength of denture repair: an in vitro comparative study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(6):684-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13091.
[5] Ozkir SE, Yilmaz B, Unal SM, Culhaoglu A, Kurkcuoglu I. Effect of heat polymerization conditions and microwave on the flexural strength of polymethyl methacrylate. European Journal of Dentistry. 2018;12(01):116-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_199_17.
[6] Jiang T, Kuila T, Kim NH, Ku BC, Lee JH. Enhanced mechanical properties of silanized silica nanoparticle attached graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2013;79:115-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.02.018.
[7] Gad MM, Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA, Näpänkangas R, Raustia A. PMMA denture base material enhancement: a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. International journal of nanomedicine. 2017;12:3801-12. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S130722.
[8] Okada K, Kameya T, Ishino H, Hayakawa T. A novel technique for preparing dental CAD/CAM composite resin blocks using the filler press and monomer infiltration method. Dental Materials Journal. 2014;33(2):203-9. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-329.
[9] Yadav M, Dwibedi V, Sharma S, George N. Biogenic silica nanoparticles from agro-waste: Properties, mechanism of extraction and applications in environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2022;10(6):108550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108550.
[10] Gad MM, Abualsaud R, Al-Thobity AM, Almaskin DF, AlZaher ZA, Abushowmi TH, et al. Effect of SiO2 nanoparticles addition on the flexural strength of repaired acrylic denture base. European Journal of Dentistry. 2020;14(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1701076.
[11] Cevik P, Yildirim‐Bicer AZ. The effect of silica and prepolymer nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of denture base acrylic resin. Journal of prosthodontics. 2018;27(8):763-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12573.
[12] Jiangkongkho P, Arksornnukit M, Takahashi H. The synthesis, modification, and application of nanosilica in polymethyl methacrylate denture base. Dental Materials Journal. 2018;37(4):582-91. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-142.
[13] Karci M, Demir N, Yazman S. Evaluation of flexural strength of different denture base materials reinforced with different nanoparticles. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(5):572-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12974.
[14] Tugwell P, Tovey D. PRISMA 2020. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;134:A5-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.008.
[15] Tu YK, Needleman I, Chambrone L, Lu HK, Faggion Jr CM. A Bayesian network meta‐analysis on comparisons of enamel matrix derivatives, guided tissue regeneration and their combination therapies. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2012;39(3):303-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01844.x.
[16] Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et  al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2011;343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.
[17] Azmy E, Al-Kholy MR, Al-Thobity AM, Gad MM, Helal MA. Comparative Effect of Incorporation of ZrO2, TiO2, and SiO2 Nanoparticles on the Strength and Surface Properties of PMMA Denture Base Material: An In Vitro Study. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5856545.
[18] Salman AD, Jani GH, Fatalla AA. Comparative study of the effect of incorporating SiO2 nano-particles on properties of poly methyl methacrylate denture bases. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal. 2017;10(3):1525-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1262.
[19] Alnamel HA, Mudhaffer M. The effect of Silicon di oxide Nano-Fillers reinforcement on some properties of heat cure polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. Journal of baghdad college of dentistry. 2014;26(1):32-6.
[20] Al-Thobity AM, Gad MM. Effect of silicon dioxide nanoparticles on the flexural strength of heat-polymerized acrylic denture base material: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2021;33(8):775-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.08.008.
Volume 5, Issue 1
March 2023
Pages 21-26
  • Receive Date: 04 November 2022
  • Revise Date: 30 December 2022
  • Accept Date: 08 January 2023
  • First Publish Date: 14 January 2023