The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets on Different Tooth Surfaces Bonded by Indirect Bonding Technique Using DT3C Device

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Orthodontics, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Scienecs, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

2 Department of Pedodontics, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Scienecs, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

3 Department of Orthodontics, Bbau Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Background and aim: This in-vitro study was conducted to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded by indirect technique in labial and lingual fixed orthodontic appliance mechanotherapy using a DT3C device.
Material and methods: The sample of 240 humans extracted premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 80 teeth each- Group-I(direct bonding of brackets on the labial surface), Group II (Indirect bonding on the labial surface), and Group III  (Indirect bonding on the lingual surface) and each group were etched with 3M etchants, and for bonding, Transbond XT was used. For group I, direct bonding was done following standard protocol. For Group II, indirect bonding was done using a customized transfer tray. For Group III, indirect bonding was done using a DT3C device and a customized transfer tray to transfer brackets on to teeth surface. Instron universal testing machine moving at a speed of 0.5 mm/min was used to measure SBS for the three groups. Data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software (Windows version 17.0) statistical analysis.
Results: Highest shear bond strength was found in Group III (16.87 ±0.39 MPa), followed by Group II (14.56 ±0.48 MPa) and least for Group I (12.45±0.29 MPa). On comparison, a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was observed in the bond strengths of all the groups evaluated.
Conclusions: Shear bond strength was highest for indirect bonding on the lingual surface, indirect bonding on the labial surface, and least for direct bonding on the labial surface.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Shimizu RH, Grando KG, Shimizu IA, Andriguetto AR, Melo AC, Witters EL. Assessment of shear bond strength of brackets bonded by direct and indirect techniques: An in vitro study. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2012;17(4):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512012000400008.
[2] Gange P. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015;147(4):S56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.011.
[3] Swetha M, Pai VS, Sanjay N, Nandini S. Indirect versus direct bonding-a shear bond strength comparison: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011;12(4):232-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1040.
[4] Joiner M. In-house precision bracket placement with the indirect bonding technique. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2010;137(6):850-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.023.
[5] Aksakalli S, Demir A. Indirect bonding: A literature review. European Journal of General Dentistry. 2012;1(01):6-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.101344.
[6] Imakami MB, Valle-Corotti KM, Carvalho PE, Scocate AC. Evaluation of shear strength of lingual brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2011;16(3):87-94. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000300011.
[7] Szerszeń M, Wiśniewska J, Garbacz M, Żuławnik A, Zielonka M, Pietrzak-Bilińska B. Comparison of direct and indirect bonding methods for orthodontic brackets. Literature review. InForum Ortodontyczne/Orthodontic Forum 2020;16(2):101-7. https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2020.97337.
[8] Milne JW, Andreassen GF, Jakobsen JR. Bond strength comparison: a simplified indirect technique versus direct placement of brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989;96(1):8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90223-0.
[9] Li Y, Mei L, Wei J, Yan X, Zhang X, Zheng W, et al. Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC oral health. 2019;19(1):137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4.
[10] Linn BJ, Berzins DW, Dhuru VB, Bradley TG. A comparison of bond strength between direct-and indirect-bonding methods. The Angle Orthodontist. 2006;76(2):289-94. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0289:ACOBSB]2.0.CO;2.
[11] Menini A, Cozzani M, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Cozzani P, Gandini P. A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial. Progress in orthodontics. 2014;15(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0070-9.
[12] Pamukcu H, Özsoy ÖP, Dağalp R. In vitro and in vivo comparison of orthodontic indirect bonding resins: A prospective study. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2018;21(5):614-23. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_252_17.
[13] Aksu B, Caniklioˇglu MC, Ozturk Y. Comparison of bond strength of lingual brackets under different composite base forming method. ellenike orthodontike epitheorese. 2005;8(2):81.
[14] Imakami MB, Valle-Corotti KM, Carvalho PE, Scocate AC. Evaluation of shear strength of lingual brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2011;16:87-94. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000300011.
[15] Premanand P, Shankar AJ. An in vivo comparison of the efficacy between direct and indirect bonding methods. Int J Dent Sci. 2014;13(1):1.
[16] Sharma N, Bhatnagar S, Sharma P, Kumar P, Shetty D, Bhardwaj R. An in vivo comparative analysis of bond survival rate between two different bonding techniques. Journal of Dental Specialities. 2020;6(2):126-30. https://doi.org/10.18231/2393-9834.2018.0029.
[17] Lombardo L, Kaplan A, Scuzzo G, Siciliani G. A comparative study of lingual bracket bond strength. Orthodontics (Chic) 2011;12:178–187.
[18] Gupta A, Kohle VS, Hazarey PV. Lingual Orthodontics: A review. J Ind Orthod Soc 2005; 38:46-54.
[19] Iglesias A, Flores T, Moyano J, Artés M, Gil FJ, Puigdollers A. In vitro study of shear bond strength in direct and indirect bonding with three types of adhesive systems. Materials. 2020;13(11):2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112644.
[20] Das SK, Labh S, Sahu CS, Sahoo N. DAS’s incisal and occlusal window transfer tray for indirect bonding in lingual orthodontics. APOS Trends Orthod. 2013;3:62-6.
[21] Öztürk F, Babacan H, Nalçacı R, Kuştarcı A. Effects of direct and indirect bonding techniques on bond strength and microleakage after thermocycling. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;39(6):393-401. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.6.393.
[22] Nandini S, Hemalatha S, Somaih SK. Air abrasion as an adjunct to conventional Acid etching in orthodontic bonding, J Dental Sci Res 2011;2:1-5.
[23] Borsatto MC, Catirse AB, Palma Dibb RG, Nascimento TN, Rocha RA, Corona SA. Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system. Brazilian dental journal. 2002;13:175-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402002000300006.
[24] Magno AF, Martins RP, Vaz LG, Martins LP. In vitro lingual bracket evaluation of indirect bonding with plasma arc, LED and halogen light. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2010;13(1):48-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01474.x.
[25] Polat O, Karaman AI, Buyukyilmaz T. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths and in vivo analysis of bond survival of indirect-bonding resins. The Angle Orthodontist. 2004;74(3):405-9. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074%3C0405:IVEOSB%3E2.0.CO;2.
[26] Miles PG, Weyant RJ. A comparison of two indirect bonding adhesives. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1019-23. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[1019:ACOTIB]2.0.CO;2.
[27] Thiyagarajah S, Spary DJ, Rock WP. A clinical comparison of bracket bond failures in association with direct and indirect bonding. Journal of Orthodontics. 2006;33(3):198-204. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531205225021615.
 [28] Deahl ST, Salome N, Hatch JP, Rugh JD. Practice-based comparison of direct and indirect bonding. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;132(6):738-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.037.
[29] Demirovic K, Slaj M, Spalj S, Slaj M, Kobaslija S. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo. Acta Informatica Medica. 2018;26(2):125-9. https://doi.org/10.5455%2Faim.2018.26.125-129.
[30] Sharifi N, Mohammadi Z, Arab S, Shojaee M, Vafadoost F, Zakerzadeh A. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with a Self-Adhering Composite in Dry and Saliva-Contaminated Conditions. Frontiers in Dentistry. 2022;19. https://doi.org/10.18502%2Ffid.v19i5.8548.
[31] Shaik JA, Reddy RK, Bhagyalakshmi K, Shah MJ, Madhavi O, Ramesh SV. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesives. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2018;9(2):289-92. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fccd.ccd_15_18.
International Journal of Scientific Research in Dental and Medical Sciences
Volume 4, Issue 4
December 2022
Pages 162-169

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 September 2022
  • Revise Date: 23 November 2022
  • Accept Date: 03 December 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics