Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mini-screw-facilitated Micro-osteoperforation Interventions on the Treatment Process in Patients with Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Uzhgorod National University, Uzhgorod, Ukraine

2 School of Dentistry, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnitsya, Ukraine

3 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnitsya, Ukraine

Abstract

Background and aim: Given that MOP is a new method, the discrepancy in the research results and its effectiveness on tooth movements and possible side effects of this method are controversial. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation interventions on the treatment process in patients with orthodontic treatment.
Materials and methods: From the electronic databases, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ISI have been used to perform systematic literature between January 2018 and July 2020. Therefore, a software program (Endnote X8) has been utilized for managing electronic titles. Searches were performed with mesh terms. The quality of the included studies has been assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. For Data extraction, two reviewers blinded and independently extracted data from the abstract and full text of the studies included. Moreover, the mean differences between the two groups (MOP and without MOP) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The Meta-analysis and forest plots have been evaluated using a software program available in the market (i.e., Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Stata V16).
Results: In the electronic and manual search process, a total of 102 potentially relevant abstracts and titles were found. Finally, a total of eight publications met the inclusion criteria required by this systematic review. Mean difference was (MD, 0.56mm 95% CI 0.53, 0.60. P= 0.00) among 8 studies.
Conclusion: The present study shows positive effects and statistically significant mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation interventions on the treatment process in patients with orthodontic treatment.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]  Nakhleh K, Joury E, Dean R, Marcenes W, Johal A. Can socioeconomic and psychosocial factors predict the duration of orthodontic treatment?. European journal of orthodontics. 2020;42(3):263-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz074.
[2]  Pinto AS, Alves LS, do Amaral Zenkner JE, Zanatta FB, Maltz M. Gingival enlargement in orthodontic patients: Effect of treatment duration. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2017;152(4):477-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.042.
[3]  Jing D, Xiao J, Li X, Li Y, Zhao Z. The effectiveness of vibrational stimulus to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0437-7.
[4]  El‐Angbawi A, McIntyre GT, Fleming PS, Bearn DR. Non‐surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010887.pub2.
[5]  Hoffmann S, Papadopoulos N, Visel D, Visel T, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Praeger TM. Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2017;78(4):301-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0085-1.
[6]  Shahabee M, Shafaee H, Abtahi M, Rangrazi A, Bardideh E. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement—a systematic review and a meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2020;42(2):211-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz049.
[7]  Li Y, Jacox LA, Little SH, Ko CC. Orthodontic tooth movement: The biology and clinical implications. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2018;34(4):207-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.007.
[8]  Andrade Jr I, Taddei SR, Souza PE. Inflammation and tooth movement: the role of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. InSeminars in Orthodontics 2012;18(4):257-269). WB Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2012.06.004.
[9]  Mundy GR. Inflammatory mediators and the destruction of bone. Journal of periodontal research. 1991;26(3):213-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1991.tb01647.x.
[10] Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal. 1983;31(1):3-9.
[11] Ferguson DJ, Vaid NR, Wilcko MT. Assessing accelerated tooth movement techniques on their own catabolic merits: a review. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2018;7(4):122-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2018.11.003.
[12] Kirschneck C, Maurer M, Wolf M, Reicheneder C, Proff P. Regular nicotine intake increased tooth movement velocity, osteoclastogenesis and orthodontically induced dental root resorptions in a rat model. International journal of oral science. 2017;9(3):174-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2017.34.
[13] Torres MC. Effect of Corticopuncture (CP), Photobiomodulation (PBM) and the Combined Method on the Rate of Tooth Movement and Root Resorption: A Molecular, Histological and Micro-CT Study in Animals (Doctoral dissertation, UCLA). 2020.
[14] Fernandez-Ferrer L, Montiel-Company JM, Candel-Marti E, Almerich-Silla JM, Penarrocha-Diago M, Bellot-Arcis C. Corticotomies as a surgical procedure to accelerate tooth movement during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2016;21(6):e703. doi:10.4317/medoral.21208.
[15] Librizzi Z, Kalajzic Z, Camacho D, Yadav S, Nanda R, Uribe F. Comparison of the effects of three surgical techniques on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model. The Angle Orthodontist. 2017;87(5):717-24. https://doi.org/10.2319/123016-940.1.
[16] Wilcko MT, Wilcko WM, Pulver JJ, Bissada NF, Bouquot JE. Accelerated osteogenic orthodontics technique: a 1-stage surgically facilitated rapid orthodontic technique with alveolar augmentation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;67(10):2149-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.095.
[17] Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Progress in orthodontics. 2016;17(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0146-9.
[18] Viwattanatipa N, Charnchairerk S. The effectiveness of corticotomy and piezocision on canine retraction: A systematic review. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2018;48(3):200-11. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.200.
[19] Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2011;343:d5928.
[20] Babanouri N, Ajami S, Salehi P. Effect of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial. Progress in Orthodontics. 2020;21(1):1-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00306-8.
[21] Sivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT, Wey MC. Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. The Angle Orthodontist. 2019;89(2):183-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/011518-47.1.
[22] Aboalnaga AA, Fayed MM, El-Ashmawi NA, Soliman SA. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Progress in orthodontics. 2019;20(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0.
 [23] Shah A, Patel V, Desai B, Patel R, Patel V. Effect of Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Contemp Orthod. 2019;4(1):12-20.
 [24] Kundi I. Effect of Flapless Cortical Perforation on Canine Retraction Rate: A Randomized Clinical Trial. International Medical Journal. 2018;25(2).
[25] Feizbakhsh M, Zandian D, Heidarpour M, Farhad SZ, Fallahi HR. The use of micro-osteoperforation concept for accelerating differential tooth movement. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2018;7(2):56-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2018.04.002.
[26] Attri S, Mittal R, Batra P, Sonar S, Sharma K, Raghavan S, et al. Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations–a randomised controlled trial. Journal of orthodontics. 2018;45(4):225-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2018.1528746.
[27] Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Alhaija EA. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;153(6):771-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.026.
[28] Yi J, Xiao J, Li H, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Z. Effectiveness of adjunctive interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2017;44(8):636-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12509.
[29] Uribe F, Padala S, Allareddy V, Nanda R. Patients', parents', and orthodontists' perceptions of the need for and costs of additional procedures to reduce treatment time. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014;145(4):S65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.015.
Volume 3, Issue 3
September 2021
Pages 147-152
  • Receive Date: 18 May 2021
  • Revise Date: 26 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 15 August 2021
  • First Publish Date: 01 September 2021