Anatomical Dimension of the Anterior Maxillary Alveolar Process: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Dental Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Monastir, Tunisia

2 Research laboratory of Occlusodontics and Ceramic Prostheses LR16ES15, 5000, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia

3 Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Monastir, Tunisia

4 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medecine, University of Monastir, Tunisia

5 Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Tunisia


Background and aim: Immediate implant therapy has become a widespread technique that immediately restoration of esthetic and function. Its dimensions should be determined after the exploration of the bone around the natural tooth. This study aimed to explore alveolar bone in the maxillary anterior region using cone-beam computed tomography, including CS 3D Imaging Software.
Materials and methods: It is a retrospective study conducted in the Dental Faculty of Medicine Monastir Tunisia. It included 400 CBCT Scans checked from the radiological center. On selected CBCT, fulfilling inclusion criteria, facial alveolar bone thicknesses in the coronal (point A), middle (point B), and apical third (point C) were calculated. Alveolar height, crest height, and tooth angulations were also determined. Using SPSS 21software, descriptive statistics including the mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. AS well  T-test, Pearson correlation, and Friedman test were used to analyze the data. The significance level was set at 95%.
Results: Mean alveolar height of maxillary central incisor, lateral incisor, and canine was respectively 20.5±3.62, 20.73±2.53, and 20.36± 2.81 mm. The difference between sites was statistically significant. Males had longer alveolar height than females. The mean facial plate thicknesses of the alveolar bone across point measurements A, B, and C were 0.86, 0.90, and 0.99mm for maxillary central incisors, 1.4, 0.80, and 0.84 mm maxillary lateral incisors and 1.08, 0.67, and 0.66mm for maxillary canines. Mean alveolar crest height (D) of the anterior maxillary teeth were 2.32 ± 1.04, 2.20 ± 0.1 and 2, 41 ±1.7 respectively at the level of maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines.
Conclusion: Facial bone is thin: lateral incisors have the most significant bone thickness, followed by central incisors, then canines with the most negligible bone thickness among the anterior maxillary teeth. Males exhibited greater facial bone heights. Facial bone thickness depends on teeth' angulations. Immediate implant placement in this area requires careful radiological exploration, taking into consideration its features.


Main Subjects

[1]  Zhang W, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning. BMC oral health. 2015;15(1):1-8.
[2]  Liu R, Yang Z, Tan J, Chen L, Liu H, Yang J. Immediate implant placement for a single anterior maxillary tooth with a facial bone wall defect: A prospective clinical study with a one-year follow-up period. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2019;21(6):1164-74.
[3]  Assery M. A 22‐Year Follow Up of Immediate Implant Placement without Bone Augmentation: A Case Series Study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2020;29(2):101-6.
[4]  Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontology. 2018;77(1):197-212.
[5]  Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, Di Placido G, Tumini V, et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. Journal of periodontology. 2001;72(11):1560-71.
[6]  Dos Santos JG, Durão AP, de Campos Felino AC, de Faria RM. Analysis of the buccal bone plate, root inclination and alveolar bone dimensions in the jawbone. A descriptive study using cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2019;10(2). doi: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10204.
[7]  AlTarawneh S, AlHadidi A, Hamdan AA, Shaqman M, Habib E. Assessment of bone dimensions in the anterior maxilla: a cone beam computed tomography study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018;27(4):321-8.
[8]  Garg AK, Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. The Implant Society:[periodical]. 1995;5(5):7-11.
[9]  Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2012;113(6):817-26.
[10] Menezes CC, Janson G, Massaro CD, Cambiaghi L, Garib DG. Reproducibility of bone plate thickness measurements with cone-beam computed tomography using different image acquisition protocols. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;15:143-9.
[11] Sheerah H, Othman B, Jaafar A, Alsharif A. Alveolar bone plate measurements of maxillary anterior teeth: A retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography study, AlMadianh, Saudi Arabia. The Saudi dental journal. 2019;31(4):437-44.
[12] Rai S, Misra D, Khatri M, Vyas T, Bhakta P, Mallick P. Maxillary anterior cortical bone thickness: An imperative parameter for implant solidity-3-dimensional cone beam CT study. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology. 2020;32(2):96-102. DOI: 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_10_20.
[13] Gluckman H, Pontes CC, Du Toit J. Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT classification for immediate implant placement. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;120(1):50-6.
 [14] Zekry A, Wang R, Chau AC, Lang NP. Facial alveolar bone wall width-a cone-beam computed tomography study in A sians. Clinical oral implants research. 2014;25(2):194-206.
[15] Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, Limpiphipatanakorn P, Yap AK, Tyndall D, et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(6):1514-19.
[16] Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29(5):1123-29.
[17] Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone‐beam computed tomography study. Clinical oral implants research. 2011;22(10):1168-71.
[18] López-Jarana P, Díaz-Castro CM, Falcão A, Falcão C, Ríos-Santos JV, Herrero-Climent M. Thickness of the buccal bone wall and root angulation in the maxilla and mandible: an approach to cone beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):1-9.
[19] Fuentes R, Flores T, Navarro P, Salamanca C, Beltrán V, Borie E. Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Journal of periodontal & implant science. 2015;45(5):162-8.
[20] Han JY, Jung GU. Labial and lingual/palatal bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors in human cadavers in Koreans. Journal of periodontal & implant science. 2011;41(2):60-6.
[21] Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, Chung CH. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2010;2(3):92-6.
[22] Boskey AL, Coleman R. Aging and bone. Journal of dental research. 2010;89(12):1333-48. doi: 10.1177/0022034510377791.
[23] Roopak, B, David  R M. Interdental bone and papilla, hold it to preserve it : a case report. Int. J. Prev. Clin. Dent. Res. 2015;2(3):73-75.
Volume 3, Issue 3
September 2021
Pages 111-116
  • Receive Date: 07 June 2021
  • Revise Date: 27 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 12 August 2021
  • First Publish Date: 16 August 2021