Silico Functional Annotation and Molecular Characterization of an Uncharacterized Protein MBO_502153 of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Variant Bovis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Life Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail 1902, Bangladesh

2 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

3 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract

Background and aim: Bovine, zoonotic, and wildlife tuberculosis are caused by Mycobacterium Bovis, whose attenuated form is used in tuberculosis and cancer treatment. There are several proteins present in its genome considered as uncharacterized or hypothetical proteins. We aim to predict the structure and function of an uncharacterized protein present in the bacterial genome of this pathogenic bacteria, Mycobacterium Bovis, by using several bioinformatics tools.
Materials and methods: Using in silico techniques, the secondary and tertiary structures of the selected uncharacterized proteins were predicted and further validated. Bioinformatics tools were used to explore physicochemical characteristics, homologous proteins, the active site, and the protein-protein interactions.
Results: By in silico study, we found that though the bacterium is a pathogenic microorganism, its uncharacterized protein MBO_502153 is non–virulent. This protein is a metabolism molecule. As the protein does not contain any kind of signal peptide, it is not a secretory protein. The uncharacterized protein MBO_502153 also does not involve any non-classical secretory pathway.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that the purposeful annotation of uncharacterized supermolecule showed some chemical activities, particularly degradation of the environmental waste product 4-chlorobenzoate and xenobiotics and synthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), which play an important role in environmental biodegradability and biocompatibility.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]  Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Castañeda-Hernández DM. Bacteria: Mycobacterium bovis. Encyclopedia of Food Safety. 2014: 468-475. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-378612-8.00103-7.
[2]  Moda G, Daborn CJ, Grange JM, Cosivi O. The zoonotic importance of Mycobacterium bovis. Tubercle and Lung Disease. 1996;77(2):103-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8479(96)90022-2.
 [3] Organization WH. Report of the WHO Meeting on Zoonotic Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis, Geneva, 15 November 1993. World Health Organization; 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-8479(96)90022-2.
[4]  Hoft DF, Gheorghiu M. Mucosal immunity induced by oral administration of bacille Calmette–Guérin. Mucosal vaccines, Elsevier; 1996, p. 269–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012410580-5/50021-2.
[5]  Meije Y, Martínez-Montauti J, Caylà JA, Loureiro J, Ortega L, Clemente M, et al. Healthcare-Associated Mycobacterium bovis–Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Infection in Cancer Patients Without Prior BCG Instillation. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2017;65(7):1136-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix496.
[6]  Nimrod G, Schushan M, Steinberg DM, Ben-Tal N. Detection of functionally important regions in “hypothetical proteins” of known structure. Structure. 2008;16(12):1755-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2008.10.017.
[7]  Chaudhry GR, Chapalamadugu S. Biodegradation of halogenated organic compounds. Microbiological reviews. 1991;55(1):59-79. https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.55.1.59-79.1991.
[8]  Furukawa K, Simon JR, Chakrabarty AM. Common induction and regulation of biphenyl, xylene/toluene, and salicylate catabolism in Pseudomonas paucimobilis. Journal of Bacteriology. 1983;154(3):1356-62. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.154.3.1356-1362.1983.
[9]  Margesin R, Labbe D, Schinner F, Greer CW, Whyte LG. Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading microbial populations in contaminated and pristine alpine soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69(6):3085-92. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.6.3085-3092.2003.
[10] Kovalcik A, Obruca S, Fritz I, Marova I. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: their importance and future. BioResources. 2019;14(2):2468-71.
[11] Steinbüchel A. Recent advances in the knowledge of the metabolism of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoic acids and potential impacts on the production of biodegradable thermoplastics. Acta biotechnologica. 1991;11(5):419-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/abio.370110504.
[12]Muhammadi, Shabina, Afzal M, Hameed S. Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates-eco-friendly next generation plastic: production, biocompatibility, biodegradation, physical properties and applications. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews. 2015;8(3-4):56-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2015.1109715.
[13] Zinn M, Witholt B, Egli T. Occurrence, synthesis and medical application of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoate. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2001;53(1):5-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00218-6.
[14] Steinbüchel A, Lütke-Eversloh T. Metabolic engineering and pathway construction for biotechnological production of relevant polyhydroxyalkanoates in microorganisms. Biochemical engineering journal. 2003;16(2):81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(03)00036-6.
[15] Koller M, Maršálek L, de Sousa Dias MM, Braunegg G. Producing microbial polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biopolyesters in a sustainable manner. New biotechnology. 2017;37:24-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.001.
[16] Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, Bairoch A. ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3784–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg563.
[17] Guruprasad K, Reddy BB, Pandit MW. Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: a novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection. 1990;4(2):155-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/4.2.155.
[18] Barh D, Tiwari S, Jain N, Ali A, Santos AR, Misra AN, et al. In silico subtractive genomics for target identification in human bacterial pathogens. Drug Development Research. 2011;72(2):162-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.20413.
[19] Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2006;64(3):643-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21018.
[20] Yu NY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, Lo R, et al. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(13):1608-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq249.
[21] Bhasin M, Garg A, Raghava GP. PSLpred: prediction of subcellular localization of bacterial proteins. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(10):2522-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti309.
[22] Imai K, Asakawa N, Tsuji T, Akazawa F, Ino A, Sonoyama M, et al. SOSUI-GramN: high performance prediction for sub-cellular localization of proteins in gram-negative bacteria. Bioinformation. 2008;2(9):417. doi: 10.6026/97320630002417.
[23] Möller S, Croning MD, Apweiler R. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(7):646-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.7.646.
[24] Tusnady GE, Simon I. The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(9):849-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.849.
[25] Dobson L, Reményi I, Tusnády GE. CCTOP: a Consensus Constrained TOPology prediction web server. Nucleic acids research. 2015;43(W1):W408-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv451.
[26] von Heijne PT. G. et al SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods.2011;8:785-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701.
[27] Bendtsen JD, Kiemer L, Fausbøll A, Brunak S. Non-classical protein secretion in bacteria. BMC microbiology. 2005;5(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-5-58.
[28] Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R. Blatter 2. MC, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O’Donovan C, Phan I, Pilbout S, Schneider M (2003) The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res.;31:365-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg095.
[29] Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J. Co ggill P., Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D222–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1223.
[30] Wilson D, Madera M, Vogel C, Chothia C, Gough J. The SUPERFAMILY database in 2007: families and functions. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D308–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl910.
[31] Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 1991:1162-4.
[32] Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37(suppl_1):D211-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn785.
[33] Shen HB, Chou KC. Predicting protein fold pattern with functional domain and sequential evolution information. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2009;256(3):441-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.007.
[34] Garg A, Gupta D. VirulentPred: a SVM based prediction method for virulent proteins in bacterial pathogens. BMC bioinformatics. 2008;9(1):1-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-62.
[35] Dillon SC, Bateman A. The Hotdog fold: wrapping up a superfamily of thioesterases and dehydratases. BMC bioinformatics. 2004;5(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-109.
[36] Kokkinidis M, Glykos NM, Fadouloglou VE. Protein flexibility and enzymatic catalysis. Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology. 2012;87:181-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398312-1.00007-X.
 [37] Neill SD, Pollock JM, Bryson DB, Hanna J. Pathogenesis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Veterinary microbiology. 1994;40(1-2):41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(94)90045-0.
[38] Hooda V, babu Gundala P, Chinthala P. Sequence analysis and homology modeling of peroxidase from Medicago sativa. Bioinformation. 2012;8(20):974-979. doi: 10.6026/97320630008974.
[39] Fukui T, Shiomi N, Doi Y. Expression and characterization of (R)-specific enoyl coenzyme A hydratase involved in polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis by Aeromonas caviae. Journal of Bacteriology. 1998;180(3):667-73. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.180.3.667-673.1998.
Volume 3, Issue 2
June 2021
Pages 78-85
  • Receive Date: 10 April 2021
  • Revise Date: 02 June 2021
  • Accept Date: 13 June 2021
  • First Publish Date: 13 June 2021