[1] Susan S. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41st Edition. 2015.
[2] Paramasivam S, Proietto A, Puvaneswary M. Pelvic anatomy and MRI. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2006;20(1):3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.09.001.
[3] Sokołowska-Pituchowa J. Formy miedniczek nerkowych u człowieka, ich odmiany, najczęstszy typ. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 1956;7:53-62.
[4] Çiçek R, Dündar G, Gökçen K, Gökçe G, Gültekin EY. The evaluation of morphology of renal pelvicalyceal system’s and infundibulopelvic anatomy of kidney’s lower pole in post-mortem series. Folia Morphologica. 2022;81(2):350-8. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2021.0041.
[5] Gómez FA, Ballesteros LE, Estupiñán HY. Anatomical study of the renal excretory system in pigs. A review of its characteristics as compared to its human counterpart. Folia Morphologica. 2017;76(2):262-8. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2016.0065.
[6] Zerdan MB, Moukarzel R, Naji NS, Bilen Y, Nagarajan A. The Urogenital System’s Role in Diseases: A Synopsis. Cancers. 2022;14(14):3328. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14143328.
[7] Ningthoujam DD, Chongtham RD, Sinam SS. Pelvi-calyceal pattern in foetal and adult human kidneys. J Anat Soc India. 2005;54:1-11.
[8] Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Uchida Y, Yoshida S, Kohno Y, Tsujii T. Proposal for a simple anatomical classification of the pelvicaliceal system for endoscopic surgery. Journal of Endourology. 2018;32(8):753-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0218.
[9] Anjana TS, Muthian E, Thiagarajan S, Shanmugam S. Gross morphological study of the renal pelvicalyceal patterns in human cadaveric kidneys. Indian Journal of Urology: IJU: Journal of the Urological Society of India. 2017;33(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.194782.
[10] Mittal MK, Sureka B, Mittal A, Sinha M, Thukral BB, Mehta V. Congenital anomalies of kidney and ureter. Anat Physiol. 2016;6(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0940.1000190.
[11] Ntalianis KM, Cheung C, Resta C, Liyanage S, Toneva F, Toneva FG. Unilateral Duplicated Collecting System Identified During Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus. 2022;14(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26331.
[12] Deepika Rani, Prateek Singha. Variations of pelvicalyceal system of kidney in human cadavers. International Journal of Scientific Research.2019;8(9):71-2.
[13] Gandhi KR, Chavan S. Revisiting the morphology of pelvicalyceal system in human cadaveric kidneys with a systematic review of literature. Asian Journal of Urology. 2019;6(3):249-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.12.006.
[14] Brant WE, Helms CA, editors. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology. 2012.
[15] Sykes D. The arterial supply of the human kidney with special reference to accessory renal arteries. British Journal of Surgery. 1963;50(222):368-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.18005022204.
[16] Arzoz-Fabregas M, Ibarz-Servio L, Blasco-Casares FJ, Ramon-Dalmau M, Ruiz-Marcellan FJ. Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?. International braz j urol. 2009;35(2):140-50. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382009000200003.
[17] Krishnaveni C, Kulkarni R, Kishore Kumar BN, Sanikop MB, Venkateshu KV. A study of renal calyces by using barium contrast. Int J Anat Res. 2014;2(2):369-74.
[18] Lin CC, Hsu YS, Chen KK. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): the impact of radiological anatomy. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2008;71(10):496-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70157-6.
[19] Verma A, Tomar V, Yadav S. Complex multiple renal calculi: stone distribution, pelvicalyceal anatomy and site of puncture as predictors of PCNL outcome. Springerplus. 2016;5:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3017-4.
[20] Tubaro A. Ureteropelvic junction: a study of its anatomical structure and function. Current Opinion in Urology. 2000;10(2):141-2.
[21] Grevious MA, Cohen M, Shah SR, Rodriguez P. Structural and functional anatomy of the abdominal wall. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2006;33(2):169-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2005.12.005.
[22] Piasecki Z, Jugowski F, Piotrowski J. Forms of human renal pelvices in casts and radiograms. Folia Morphologica. 1969;28(2):177-87.
[23] Zhu W, Zheng M, Xiong S, Han G, Meng C, Li Z, et al. Modified Takazawa anatomical classification of renal pelvicalyceal system based on three-dimensional virtual reconstruction models. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2021;10(7):2944-52. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-309.
[24] Naik PS. Morphological Study of Pelvicalyceal System of Kidney in Human Cadavers. Anat Physiol. 2019;9:1000314.
[25] Qi Y, Lin F, Li B, Han S, Yu W, Rao T, et al. Classification and clinical significance of the posterior group of renal calyces. Medicine. 2023;102(31):e34443.
[26] Kawase K, Hamamoto S, Taguchi K, Inoue T, Okada S, Sugino T, et al. Impact of pelvicalyceal anatomical variation on surgical outcomes of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. BJUI compass. 2023;4(2):173-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.209.
[27] Sebe P, Traxer O, Lechevallier E, Saussine C. Anatomy of intrarenal urinary tract: Anatomic considerations in endo-urology. Progres en Urologie: Journal de L'association Francaise D'urologie et de la Societe Francaise D'urologie. 2008;18(12):837-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.09.039.
[28] Smith BJ. The urogenital system. InAtlas of feline anatomy for veterinarians 2017:171-192. Teton NewMedia.
[29] Sampaio FJ, Mandarim-De-Lacerda CA. 3-Dimensional and radiological pelviocaliceal anatomy for endourology. The Journal of urology. 1988;140(6):1352-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42042-8.