[1] Al-Zoubi H, Alharbi AA, Ferguson DJ, Zafar MS. Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: A retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms. European journal of dentistry. 2017;11(1):117-121. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_308_16.
[2] Lai CS, Suter VG, Katsaros C, Bornstein MM. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers. European journal of orthodontics. 2014;36(4):450-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt074.
[3] Izadikhah I, Cao D, Zhao Z, Yan B. Different Management Approaches in Impacted Maxillary Canines: An Overview on Current Trends and Literature. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2020;21(3):326-36.
[4] Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011;33(1):93-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq034.
[5] Ngo CT, Fishman LS, Rossouw PE, Wang H, Said O. Correlation between panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary impacted canines. The Angle Orthodontist. 2018;88(4):384-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/103117-739.1.
[6] Sajnani AK. Permanent maxillary canines–review of eruption pattern and local etiological factors leading to impaction. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. 2015;6(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12067.
[7] Elmarhoumy S, Gomaa N. Assessment of maxillary impacted canines using panoramic radiograph and cone-beam computed tomography. Egyptian Dental Journal.2020;66(4):2015-2019.DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.39553.1213.
[8] Christell H, Birch S, Bondemark L, Horner K, Lindh C, SEDENTEXCT consortium. The impact of Cone Beam CT on financial costs and orthodontists’ treatment decisions in the management of maxillary canines with eruption disturbance. European journal of orthodontics. 2018;40(1):65-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx039.
[9] El Beshlawy DM. Radiographic assessment of impacted maxillary canine position using CBCT: A comparative study of 2 methods. Egyptian Dental Journal.2019;65(4):3393-402. DOI: 10.21608/edj.2019.74780.
[10] Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud MI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017;151(2):248-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.018.
[11] Alhammadi MS, Asiri HA, Almashraqi AA. Incidence, severity and orthodontic treatment difficulty index of impacted canines in Saudi population. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2018;10(4):e327.
[12] Nagpal A, Pai KM, Setty S, Sharma G. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using panoramic radiography. Journal of oral science. 2009;51(1):37-45. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.37.
[13] Kanwar A. Evaluation of positionof maxillary impacted canine and its effect on adjacent teeth-A correlation study between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research 2016; 7(9): 472-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.
[14] Alfaleh W, Al Thobiani S. Evaluation of Impacted Maxillary Canine Position Using Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.014.
[15] Bhuvaneshwari AJ, Singh MP. Use of panoramic radiograph as a single radiographic technique to localize impacted maxillary canine. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2010;2(6):163-5.